Many argue that music streaming sites like Spotify, Pandora and the coming soon Myspace Music 2.0 have stimulated a new form of sharing and experiencing music, however I argue that this progression is simply a return back to former behaviour. When consumers suddenly had access to millions of songs, for free, in the late 90s, consumers stopped experiencing music together and the excitement of owning music died. However consumers have an innate need to share and experience music - in concerts, with friends listening to the radio, and so on. We want others opinions on music we like, music we don't like.. it binds us together. These new services simply support this need in an online context.
I strongly suspect that illegal downloading will soon be perceived as too static, one directional and not engaging as service providers continue to improve nurturing this need of collective experience and sharing. Studies already indicate that countries with easy access to music streaming services witness sharp declines in illegal downloading. Wake up Australia!
Do you agree? Is the industry finally getting it right and accepted that people simply demand more value for money when it comes to consuming music? If not, what more need to be done?
I hope you are right and hope they get it right! As mentioned previously, it is sad to see no real good artists come out by the numbers they used to, simply because the illegal industry threatened their future. Hopefully SM can come to the rescue and create something that will bring back some good music!
ReplyDeleteRoss
Thanks for your comment Ross. Talking about numbers, it'll be interesting to see how artists are ranked in the future if music is simply streamed rather than purchased. Perhaps a "Popularity" ranking rather than "sales"...
ReplyDeleteConsumers have been over charged for music for far too long, a streaming like SERVICE rather than a song PRODUCT seems to be the way to go!
ReplyDelete